<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Native Heritage Month</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.fluteportal.com/2009/11/04/native-heritage-month/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.fluteportal.com/2009/11/04/native-heritage-month/</link>
	<description>A resource for Native American and World flutes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 08:34:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Denise Johanson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fluteportal.com/2009/11/04/native-heritage-month/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise Johanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fluteportal.com/?p=491#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Where do I find these &#039;field recordings&#039;? Are they also called Wax cylinder recordings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where do I find these &#8216;field recordings&#8217;? Are they also called Wax cylinder recordings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick McDaniel / Lewisville, TX</title>
		<link>http://blogs.fluteportal.com/2009/11/04/native-heritage-month/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick McDaniel / Lewisville, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.fluteportal.com/?p=491#comment-97</guid>
		<description>In the Daniel Chazenoff songbooks, there is a statement that they are for NAF, yet when I looked over them, they appeared to be in recorder notation. What is your own impression?

I didn&#039;t really want to spend a lot of time converting them to today&#039;s NAF, even if it has become more &quot;standardized&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Daniel Chazenoff songbooks, there is a statement that they are for NAF, yet when I looked over them, they appeared to be in recorder notation. What is your own impression?</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t really want to spend a lot of time converting them to today&#8217;s NAF, even if it has become more &#8220;standardized&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

